Startups do fail. What’s New?

I am seeing a flurry of activity among the tech blogs who’ve caught on a interesting topic to latch onto. Failed startups. If you ask me, I am not sure what the big hoopla in this is about.

Birds fly. Fishes Swim. Deals Fall through and Startups Fail. This is the natural order of things. The only thing we can do is alleviate the chances of success for a startup by a small degree. We do not, neither can anyone assure anyone of success and failures totally. Heck, the Silicon valley, which is considered to be this rich ecosystem, has its fair share of failures. What are we going to do about that?

“Success is one in a million. There is a very small chance that you could be that one and the obvious choice left is to fail. Are you ready for that?” is what my mentor used to ask me. For the first six and a half months, as I was pursuing him to be my mentor, every single book he gave me was on this amazing idea, great execution which went nowhere and resulted in a failed business. I used to think what was the point he was trying to make there. It was simple. Success in a startup is an anamoly. The natural route is failure. If there is one breed of people who can dare change that, it would be an entrepreneur. Yet there are factors and choices beyond our control which all contribute against it.

I remember talking to some students a few months back and the question kept going back to the concept of failing. How do you mitigate that risk and all that. I thought it was one of the profound and mature audiences that I had dealt with. I don’t even get some of those question at Proto.in, where startups are on a much progressive stage. I am hoping that they already know the answers to that.

Most of the startups that are slowly gaining traction are on an average on their third iteration. Most companies that come to Proto.in themselves are on their second iteration. It’s quite obvious when you talk to them and see how they have evolved their offering based on market interaction. It is that iteration which actually is the strength of a startup. Remember Agile, evolving, and the path towards a “complete” product? It’s all part and parcel of that.

There is this interesting session that happens when you learn how to skate – whether on ice or on inlines. The first thing you learn is how to fall. How to fall gracefully is the next step. If you are afraid of failure, You wouldn’t even move a step ahead. You need to dare, and that’s what entrepreneurship essentially is all about. There is a high level of risk and high level of reward at the end. Not everyone who get a lottery wins, and not everyone who starts up a company also succeeds. I am not sure what is news about it.

As long as you are afraid of falling, you won’t be able to stand up on your feet either. I can assure you that. I’ll leave you with these following words, which we had posted on a high banner for the first edition of Proto.in. Perhaps it needs to be much more visible, perhaps even everyday:

It’s not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or when the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and spends himself in a worth cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement; and who at the worst if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory or defeat. – Theodore Roosevelt

Note: Repost from the Author’s Blog.

Proto.in on Facebook.

So once in Six months, it seems that the entire ecosystem comes together. Awesome. But is there anything at all that we can do to keep the community together and offers means of interacting, expanding their network and solving each other’s problem? That was the question.

While we would eventually want to build a networking platform that we announced during Proto.in January Edition as “Proto.in Online”, we have created a page in Facebook which will serve that purpose while the platform is being built, tested and tried, and as we also narrow down on some of the unique features that we want to put in. Who wants another social networking site anyways, right? That’s the point. The rule always has been, if we are going to ask someone to go even an inch more to do a task, might as well have a strong case as to why and what he/she gets out of it.

Philosophies and thoughts aside, you are all more than welcome to join the Proto.in page at Facebook at the link below. Feel free to interact and start a discussion and pitch your thoughts into one that is up and running. I’d like to keep this as unmoderated as possible, with the premise that everybody agrees to play nice. That said, this is the link to follow:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Protoin/18654630002

Hope to see you there.

Ixigo Acquires Funding.

These are some of the proud moments to Proto.in, when the companies that get on-stage start achieving milestones. Acquiring clients, closing deals, getting their first round of funding, gaining market traction, all are fabulous news to us and that’s what keeps the team here at Proto.in motivated to push forward.

Ixigo, one of the travel search engine companies that took the stage in the first edition of Proto.in has closed its round of funding from an Angel group based out of Singapore. It’s been a fabulous journey so far interacting with Aloke frequently as they built their market traction and the fun moments we had when some of their servers had to be expanded because of load and discussing options.

Wishing Ixigo, and the men behind the company, Aloke and Dharmendra a great journey ahead. together.

The Height of Entrepreneurial Season

I am just hearing accounts of E-Summit at the Entrepreneurial Cell of IIT Mumbai and its quite nice to see many of the academia adapting to more of the entrepreneurial ambience, than the usual student-run business plan competitions. These are certainly signs of interesting times ahead.

The sad part though is the re-appearance of the same set of companies in all these forums and the same investor community who are present, making it more of the same for the rest of the audiences and wondering if the ecosystem is evolving and if innovation is still alive and kicking. I am wondering that myself.

For one, I am seriously wondering for the reason that a startup would want to take so many stages. I realize that more than five minutes of glory, which is where it all starts, mentorship (and not the 45 minute speed dating kind) is what is one of the crucial elements that is lacking out there. So if any of these entrepreneurial summits do want to take a stab at solving a real issue, there’s one. The only validity that these “stages” provide a startup is the market traction. If they can’t build it in one platform, re-appearing in multiple forums just tarnishes the image of the company and starts to paint a desperate picture. Is this happening with or without being aware of the consequences, is the second question.

I am seeing activities ranging all the way from the Department of Science and Technology, all the way to universities, to forums such as TiE, taking a firm and upbeat stance in changing things happen. But quite seriously, we need to go beyond networking and being just another “hand-shaking forum”. There are plenty of ways to do that these days, thanks to the online medium, but is anyone with a solid background and experience, willing to lead?